Search for: "B. Potter" Results 1 - 20 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 1:56 pm by Marina Chafa
In the opposition filed by Warner Bros., the studio stated, “[b]ecause of… careful development of the things and people that populate the Harry Potter universe, the films have become associated with certain names, marks, phrases, and indicia which, in the public mind, are inextricably linked with the films or their characters and phrases and which function as trademarks, both for entertainment works and for various goods and services. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:50 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Potter represents clients in several other industries. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:29 am by Immigration Prof
The internet has responded with a Harry Potter meme. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
The case of B v B [2012] EWHC 1924 (Fam), decided today, contains another judicial warning upon the preparation of court bundles. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Mr Justice Jay found that Mrs Potter could not rely on s 32(1)(b) LA 1980 by itself because (a) the non-disclosure was not an active concealment but rather a case of omission to disclose; and (b) there was no legal duty to disclose the commissions. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
And this is why we must await the ruling to be issued by Judge Robert B. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Pot possession under two ounces is a Class B misdemeanor and defendants almost always receive probation. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:19 pm by Michael Froomkin
Rowling’s next Harry Potter novel. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal therefore disagreed with Mr Justice Jay’s finding that Mrs Potter could not rely on the LA 1980, s 32(1)(b). [read post]